These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, remove them from the U.S. |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: No, remove them from the U.S.
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 83 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We support and demand legislation–a legal immigration system that complements and promotes the best for the United States of Ame...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka would agree with this statement, as he does not support amnesty for illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as he believes in strict enforcement of immigration laws, which would include removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement, as he believes in holding those accountable who break the law, including companies that employ illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in upholding the rule of law, including immigration laws. He would not support amnesty for illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, but allow them to stay
Peroutka's stance on immigration is strict, and he would not support allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. without facing legal consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Even if illegal immigrants pay taxes, Peroutka would not support amnesty for them, as he believes in strict enforcement of immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Peroutka would not support creating a simple path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, as he believes in upholding the rule of law and the existing immigration process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 484 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
