These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “The data show that fences don't keep migrants out - they just keep them from going home” ‐foreignpolicy.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Answer: Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 103 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, would likely support measures to secure the U.S. borders, including a wall. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for a wall along the southern border. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one
Peroutka might support a high-tech surveillance barrier as a more effective and potentially less costly alternative to a physical wall, in line with his party's emphasis on practical and fiscally responsible solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
While there is no specific record of Peroutka advocating for Mexico to pay for a border wall, his party's stance on fiscal responsibility and border security suggests he might support such a proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase our military presence along the southern border
Peroutka might support increased military presence along the southern border as a means of enhancing border security, in line with his party's stance on national defense and immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, keep the current wall but do not build more of it
While Peroutka might not oppose keeping the current wall, his party's stance on border security suggests he would not be satisfied with merely maintaining the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this would be too costly and ineffective
While Peroutka might have concerns about the cost and effectiveness of a border wall, his party's stance on border security suggests he would not outright oppose it on these grounds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given his party's stance on immigration and border security, it is unlikely that Peroutka would oppose the construction of a border wall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should adopt an open border policy
Peroutka's party strongly opposes open border policies, so it is highly unlikely that he would support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 11,442 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here