These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 2hrs ago
Answer: Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 79 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, would likely strongly agree with incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. This aligns with his party's principles of promoting private sector solutions over government intervention.
Strongly agree
No
Peroutka's political stance aligns with the Constitution Party's principles of limited government. He would likely agree with not increasing government funding for mental health research and treatment, preferring private sector solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
While Peroutka might agree with the sentiment of personalized care over subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, the suggestion of increasing government funding contradicts his political philosophy of limited government. Therefore, he would likely disagree with this statement, but not as strongly as with a blanket increase in funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with the idea of increasing government funding for mental health research and treatment, as it goes against his party's principles of minimal government involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Peroutka's political philosophy is rooted in limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with the idea of increasing government funding to improve the quality of mental healthcare, as it contradicts his party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,304 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here