These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 100 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “General Welfare is not the same as individual Welfare. General Welfare would benefit the people generally, individual Welfare ta...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Peroutka's political philosophy aligns with the Constitution Party's platform, which advocates for limited government intervention in social programs. Therefore, he would likely agree with not increasing federal funding for any social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's political philosophy aligns with the Constitution Party's platform, which advocates for limited government intervention in healthcare. Therefore, he would likely agree with not increasing federal funding for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in limited government. However, it's not clear if he would fully support abolishing Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in states' rights and limited federal government. However, it's not clear if he would fully support each state deciding their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While Peroutka would likely agree with limiting eligibility for Medicaid, it's not clear if he would specifically limit it to the elderly and disabled.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
While Peroutka would likely agree with limiting eligibility for Medicaid, it's not clear if he would support increasing funding, even for specific groups like the elderly and disabled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in limited government and would likely oppose federal funding for healthcare, including Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Peroutka would strongly disagree with this statement as it suggests a larger role for the federal government in healthcare, which contradicts his belief in limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,974 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here