These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseYes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 87 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Constitution Party Answer: No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “One of the most extraordinary documents in human history—the Bill of Rights—has come to an end under president Barack Obama…a la...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a constitutionalist and believes in the strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution. He would likely argue that enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, violate the 8th amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in the importance of upholding constitutional rights and his likely belief that torture is an ineffective form of interrogation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his constitutionalist views and his belief in the importance of upholding the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in the importance of adhering to international law and his likely opposition to the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics
While Peroutka might agree with the use of psychological tactics, he would likely still have reservations about any form of enhanced interrogation that could potentially violate the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists
Although this statement suggests a more limited use of enhanced interrogation techniques, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his belief in the importance of upholding constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only as a last resort
While this statement suggests a more cautious approach to the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his strict constitutionalist views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Peroutka's strict constitutionalist views would likely lead him to disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, as they could be seen as a violation of the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism
Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests a willingness to violate constitutional rights in the name of preventing terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,080 voters that identify as Constitution.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here