Try the political quiz

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on torture

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military be allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, to gain information from suspected terrorists?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseYes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 11hrs ago

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

Answer: Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 87 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Constitution Party Answer: No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “One of the most extraordinary documents in human history—the Bill of Rights—has come to an end under president Barack Obama…a la...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Michael Anthony Peroutka is a constitutionalist and believes in the strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution. He would likely argue that enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, violate the 8th amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation

Peroutka would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in the importance of upholding constitutional rights and his likely belief that torture is an ineffective form of interrogation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his constitutionalist views and his belief in the importance of upholding the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

Peroutka would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in the importance of adhering to international law and his likely opposition to the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

While Peroutka might agree with the use of psychological tactics, he would likely still have reservations about any form of enhanced interrogation that could potentially violate the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists

Although this statement suggests a more limited use of enhanced interrogation techniques, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his belief in the importance of upholding constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only as a last resort

While this statement suggests a more cautious approach to the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his strict constitutionalist views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Peroutka's strict constitutionalist views would likely lead him to disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, as they could be seen as a violation of the 8th amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism

Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests a willingness to violate constitutional rights in the name of preventing terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,080 voters that identify as Constitution.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here