These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 97 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Constitution Party Answer: Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “The Constitution Party opposes all violent acts of sedition, treason and covert guerilla warfare conducted on U.S. soil. Individ...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. His party's platform emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and security, which could be interpreted as prioritizing the rights of U.S. citizens over those of foreign terrorism suspects. Furthermore, the Constitution Party generally believes in a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, which does not explicitly extend rights to non-U.S. citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement. His party's platform emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and security, which could be interpreted as prioritizing the rights of U.S. citizens over those of foreign terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture
Peroutka might somewhat agree with this statement. While he would likely not support extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects, he might support their trial in military tribunals and the prohibition of torture, in line with the Constitution Party's emphasis on justice and human dignity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, would likely disagree with this statement. The Constitution Party generally believes in strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, which does not explicitly extend rights to non-U.S. citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts
Peroutka would likely disagree with this statement. His party's platform emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and security, which could be interpreted as prioritizing the rights of U.S. citizens over those of foreign terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay
Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The Constitution Party's platform does not support the extension of constitutional rights to non-U.S. citizens, and it also emphasizes the importance of national security, which could be interpreted as supporting the continued operation of Guantanamo Bay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,153 voters that identify as Constitution.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here