Michael Anthony Peroutka

Strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

This answer aligns with Peroutka's non-interventionist stance and his belief in the importance of diplomacy and peaceful negotiations over military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Peroutka's non-interventionist stance would likely make him more inclined to agree with this answer. He would likely advocate for peaceful solutions and negotiations over military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

This answer aligns with Peroutka's non-interventionist stance, as it suggests that North Korea is not an immediate threat that would justify military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should let China address this issue

Peroutka might agree with this answer to some extent, as it suggests a non-interventionist approach. However, it's unclear whether he would specifically advocate for China to address the issue.

Slightly agree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Peroutka might somewhat agree with this answer, as it suggests skepticism about the perceived threat from North Korea. However, his exact views on North Korea's capabilities are not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally advocates for non-interventionist foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the idea of conducting military strikes against North Korea, as it could be seen as an aggressive act of war without proper constitutional authorization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

While Peroutka would likely agree that the U.S. should protect itself from potential threats, his non-interventionist stance would likely make him disagree with the idea of preemptive military strikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.