These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: No, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 63 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “"[T]he Constitution Party is forthright in its opposition to any treaty that endangers U.S. sovereignty and the best interests o...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with not supporting the TPP. His party, the Constitution Party, has a platform that emphasizes protecting American jobs and sovereignty, which they believe can be threatened by international trade agreements like the TPP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. The Constitution Party is generally skeptical of large international agreements like the TPP, believing they often contain hidden provisions that can be detrimental to American interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. The Constitution Party, which he represented in the 2004 Presidential election, is generally against free trade agreements like the TPP, believing they incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, would likely strongly disagree with supporting the TPP. The Constitution Party generally opposes free trade agreements, viewing them as detrimental to American sovereignty and jobs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, it will bring economic growth to all countries involved
Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a member of the Constitution Party, he would likely view the potential economic growth from the TPP as less important than the potential loss of American jobs and sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 110 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here