Try the political quiz

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on supreme court reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 11hrs ago

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

Answer: No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 80 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he strongly believes in the original interpretation of the Constitution and would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as unconstitutional and a potential threat to the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has often spoken out against the politicization of the judiciary and would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to its independence and impartiality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as he is a strong advocate for the original interpretation of the Constitution. He would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to the balance of power as outlined in the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Peroutka might see some merit in the idea of term limits as a way to prevent judicial activism, he would likely still disagree with this statement as it suggests a reform to the Supreme Court, which he would likely see as a deviation from the original intent of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in the original interpretation of the Constitution. He would likely disagree with the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges, as it could be seen as a deviation from the original intent of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he would likely see the addition of more seats to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to the balance of power as outlined in the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 591 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here