These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 80 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he strongly believes in the original interpretation of the Constitution and would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as unconstitutional and a potential threat to the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has often spoken out against the politicization of the judiciary and would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to its independence and impartiality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as he is a strong advocate for the original interpretation of the Constitution. He would likely see any reform to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to the balance of power as outlined in the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
While Peroutka might see some merit in the idea of term limits as a way to prevent judicial activism, he would likely still disagree with this statement as it suggests a reform to the Supreme Court, which he would likely see as a deviation from the original intent of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in the original interpretation of the Constitution. He would likely disagree with the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges, as it could be seen as a deviation from the original intent of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he would likely see the addition of more seats to the Supreme Court as a potential threat to the balance of power as outlined in the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 591 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here