These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 84 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “We deplore and vigorously oppose legislation and executive action that deprive the people of their rights secured under the Four...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka was a staunch critic of the Patriot Act, arguing that it was unconstitutional and infringed on individual rights. His platform was based on strict adherence to the Constitution, which he believed the Patriot Act violated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Peroutka's platform was based on strict adherence to the Constitution, which includes protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. He would likely strongly agree with passing strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but the sections involving surveillance and criminalization are too broad
While Peroutka would agree that the sections involving surveillance and criminalization are too broad, this answer still implies some level of support for the Patriot Act. Given his strong opposition to the Act, he would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but limit the scope of the government’s powers
While Peroutka might agree with limiting the scope of government powers, he fundamentally opposed the Patriot Act. Therefore, he would likely disagree with this statement because it still implies some level of support for the Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly opposed the Patriot Act. He believed it violated the Constitution and infringed on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 540 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here