Try the political quiz

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on gun liability

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 5hrs ago

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 99 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Peroutka's strong support for the Second Amendment and limited government would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Peroutka might somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in personal responsibility. He would likely argue that businesses should be held accountable for their own actions, such as negligence, but not for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While Peroutka supports the right to sue, he would likely disagree with this statement due to his belief in the Second Amendment and limited government intervention. He would likely argue that such lawsuits could be used to unfairly target firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Peroutka would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of firearms dealers. He would likely argue that dealers are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse the firearms they sell. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Michael Anthony Peroutka is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and believes in limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity, but for self-defense and other lawful purposes. Furthermore, he would likely argue that it is not the responsibility of businesses to control how their products are used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 29mins ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Most Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,083 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here