These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 99 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's strong support for the Second Amendment and limited government would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Peroutka might somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in personal responsibility. He would likely argue that businesses should be held accountable for their own actions, such as negligence, but not for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Peroutka supports the right to sue, he would likely disagree with this statement due to his belief in the Second Amendment and limited government intervention. He would likely argue that such lawsuits could be used to unfairly target firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Peroutka would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of firearms dealers. He would likely argue that dealers are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse the firearms they sell. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and believes in limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Peroutka would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity, but for self-defense and other lawful purposes. Furthermore, he would likely argue that it is not the responsibility of businesses to control how their products are used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 29mins ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,083 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here