Try the political quiz

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 11hrs ago

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 71 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

Party influence

Constitution Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “The Constitution Party seeks the restoration of an electoral process which is controlled at the state and local level and is bey...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Peroutka's stance on limited government intervention suggests that he might prefer the redrawing of Congressional districts to be handled by existing political structures rather than an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, there is no better alternative

Peroutka might agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in limited government intervention and the idea that existing political structures should handle such matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Peroutka might somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests that gerrymandering can help officials represent their constituents more effectively. However, his stance on this issue is not explicitly known. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

While Peroutka might agree that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage, his preference for limited government intervention might lead him to disagree with the solution of an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a member of the Constitution Party, generally supports limited government intervention. He might not agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts, as it could be seen as an unnecessary government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Peroutka's belief in limited government intervention suggests that he might not support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, as it could be seen as an unnecessary change to existing political structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 285 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here