These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 79 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Peroutka is a strong proponent of property rights and believes that the government should not have the power to seize private property under any circumstances. This aligns with his Constitutional Party's platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
This answer aligns with Peroutka's belief in the sanctity of private property rights and his opposition to government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
While Peroutka might be slightly more open to this possibility in extreme cases of national emergency, his strong belief in property rights would likely still lead him to disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Peroutka's political philosophy is rooted in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, which he believes protects private property rights. He would likely disagree with the government seizing private property even for public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While this answer includes compensation above fair market price, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his belief that the government should not have the power to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
Even though this answer includes fair compensation and community benefit, Peroutka would likely still disagree due to his strong belief in the inviolability of private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Peroutka would strongly disagree with this statement as it contradicts his belief in the inviolability of private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a staunch advocate for property rights and would likely disagree with the government seizing private property for any reason, including for an oil pipeline project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 426 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here