Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Matt Bevin’s policy on gay marriage

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?

MB>MB  Voting recordNo, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Matt Bevin’s answer is based on the following data:

Voting record

Answer: No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Reference: “If it’s all right to have same-sex marriages, why not define a marriage — because at the end of the day a lot of this ends up be...” ‐huffpost.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s voting record on this issue.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “We reaffirm our support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the c...” ‐gop.com

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 34,461 voters that identify as Republican.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here