president of the United States from 1963 to 1969.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Lyndon B. Johnson voterbaseYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination |
Lyndon B. Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 285 voters that voted for Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1964 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “House Democrats introduced a resolution Monday urging bolstered discrimination protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transg...” ‐thehill.com
Agree
Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
Johnson was a strong advocate for civil rights and signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. He would likely agree with the government doing more to protect minorities from discrimination, although the concept of 'gender identity' was not part of the discourse during his presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Given the historical context of Johnson's presidency, it's likely he would not have opposed this stance, as the concept of 'gender identity' was not widely recognized or understood during his time in office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined
Given the time period of Johnson's presidency, it's likely that he would have understood gender in binary terms. However, there's no evidence to suggest he would have taken a strong stance on the genetic versus psychological determination of gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
While Johnson was a proponent of mental health care and signed the Community Mental Health Act, there's no evidence to suggest he would have viewed 'gender identity' as a mental health issue. However, given the lack of understanding and recognition of 'gender identity' during his presidency, he might not have strongly disagreed with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
While Lyndon B. Johnson was a strong advocate for civil rights and signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the concept of 'gender identity' as we understand it today was not a part of the public discourse during his presidency. Therefore, it's unlikely he would have taken a strong stance on this specific issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies
Johnson was a strong advocate for civil rights and anti-discrimination laws. He signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with repealing anti-discrimination laws for private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 18mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 32,009 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here