Try the political quiz

Lyndon B. Johnson’s policy on dual citizenship

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should immigrants to the United States be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

  Lyndon B. Johnson voterbaseYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism

Lyndon B. Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 21hrs ago

Lyndon B. Johnson voters

Answer: Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 256 voters that voted for Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1964 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, unless they have committed a crime

Johnson's support for civil rights and due process, as evidenced by his signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, suggests he would likely agree with the idea of not allowing dual citizenship for those who have committed a crime. However, his specific views on dual citizenship are not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism

Given Johnson's commitment to national security during the Cold War era, it's plausible that he would agree with not allowing dual citizenship for those who have committed an act of terrorism. However, his specific views on dual citizenship are not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Lyndon B. Johnson was a proponent of civil rights and immigration reform, as seen in his signing of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. However, there's no specific historical evidence to suggest he had a strong stance on dual citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations

While Johnson was supportive of immigrant rights, there's no specific historical evidence to suggest he had a strong stance on the issue of dual citizenship, let alone the specifics of holding citizenship status of more than two nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Johnson's signing of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which abolished the national-origins quota system, suggests he was generally supportive of immigrant rights. However, his views on dual citizenship specifically are not well-documented.

Strongly disagree

No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship

Johnson's support for immigrant rights, as evidenced by his signing of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, suggests he would likely disagree with revoking dual citizenship status for those currently holding it. However, his specific views on dual citizenship are not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time

Johnson was a strong advocate for immigration reform and signed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which significantly increased immigration to the United States. This suggests he would strongly disagree with the idea of not allowing any new immigrants into the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 9hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,109 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here