U.S. Representative from Delaware.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Lisa Blunt Rochester’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 19hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 13 voters that voted for Lisa Blunt Rochester in the 2022 Delaware District (at Large) US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “House Democrats introduced a resolution Monday urging bolstered discrimination protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transg...” ‐thehill.com
Very strongly agree
Yes
Lisa Blunt Rochester is a Democrat who has consistently supported LGBTQ+ rights. She co-sponsored the Equality Act in 2019, which would add 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
Lisa Blunt Rochester has consistently advocated for stronger protections for minorities, including LGBTQ+ individuals. Her support for the Equality Act is a clear indication of this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Given her support for the Equality Act, it is clear that Lisa Blunt Rochester would strongly disagree with not adding 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies
Lisa Blunt Rochester has consistently supported anti-discrimination laws and has shown no indication that she would support their repeal for private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined
Lisa Blunt Rochester's support for the Equality Act, which includes protections for transgender individuals, indicates that she would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
Lisa Blunt Rochester's support for the Equality Act and LGBTQ+ rights suggests that she would strongly disagree with the notion of treating gender identity as a mental health issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 32,003 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here