U.S. Representative from Delaware.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time |
Lisa Blunt Rochester’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
Lisa Blunt Rochester's own tenure in Congress suggests that she values the experience and knowledge gained over multiple terms. This could indicate that she agrees with the idea that officials become more effective representatives over time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given that Lisa Blunt Rochester has not publicly supported term limits, it can be inferred that she may not be in favor of them. Her own tenure in Congress suggests that she values the experience and knowledge gained over multiple terms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
Given that Lisa Blunt Rochester has not publicly supported term limits, she may agree with the idea that elections serve as a form of term limits. However, without a direct statement from her on this issue, this is an inference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Lisa Blunt Rochester has not publicly advocated for term limits for members of Congress. As a member of Congress herself, she may believe in the value of experience and continuity in these roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Lisa Blunt Rochester has not publicly supported term limits for either the House or the Senate. This suggests she would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
While Lisa Blunt Rochester is likely in favor of preventing corruption and increasing performance, she has not publicly supported term limits as a means to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
Lisa Blunt Rochester has not publicly advocated for decreasing the salary and retirement benefits of members of Congress, nor has she supported term limits. This suggests she would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,883 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
