American politician (born 1961).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Kevin Hern’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 714 voters that voted for Kevin Hern in the 2020 Oklahoma District 1 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Very strongly agree
No
Hern's stance on the Second Amendment and his voting record suggest that he would strongly agree with this statement. He has consistently opposed measures that would place additional liability on firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Hern is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he may agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence. However, his strong support for gun rights suggests that he would not support broadening the scope of liability beyond current law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Hern supports the right to sue, he likely would not support this in the context of gun violence victims suing firearms dealers and manufacturers, given his strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to additional restrictions on gun owners, dealers, and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Hern's strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to additional restrictions on gun owners, dealers, and manufacturers suggest that he would disagree with this statement, even though it only targets dealers and not manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Kevin Hern is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed legislation that would place additional restrictions on gun owners, dealers, and manufacturers. He would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Hern would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has consistently opposed measures that would place additional liability on firearms dealers and manufacturers, and this statement suggests a level of liability that goes beyond current law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,750 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here