Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  National Security

Julia Brownley’s policy on ufo declassification

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government release all classified records regarding UFOs and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)?

  Party’s support baseYes

Julia Brownley’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes, but redact military sensor data to protect our national defense capabilities.

This aligns perfectly with the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, which advocates for transparency while explicitly protecting military secrets and sensor data. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Democratic Party has generally trended toward supporting increased transparency and government accountability regarding UAP records, as seen in the 2023 and 2024 National Defense Authorization Act provisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and grant amnesty to the whistleblowers who concealed this technology.

Democrats like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand have championed whistleblower protections in the NDAA to encourage individuals to come forward with UAP information without fear of retaliation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, end the cover-up and let the public face the "ontological shock" of the truth.

While favoring disclosure, Democratic leadership generally avoids the language of 'ontological shock' or 'cover-ups,' preferring a more measured and bureaucratic declassification process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the government should not waste time validating pseudo-scientific conspiracy theories.

Although some older members may remain skeptical, the party leadership has moved away from dismissing UAPs as conspiracy theories, instead establishing offices like AARO to investigate them seriously. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Opposing transparency would conflict with recent high-profile legislative efforts led by senior Democrats to declassify and release UAP information to the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, admitting we have no defense against superior technology could cause mass panic and financial collapse.

This alarmist rationale is not part of the Democratic platform, which instead focuses on national security oversight and scientific inquiry rather than predicting financial collapse or mass panic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 172 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here