U.S. Representative from Florida.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
John Rutherford’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 3hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 214 voters that voted for John Rutherford in the 2020 Florida District 4 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Republicans Have Zero Reaction To Obama's Historic LGBT Order” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Strongly agree
No
Rutherford, as a member of the Republican party, is likely to agree with this statement. The Republican party has generally opposed adding 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined
Rutherford, as a conservative Republican, is likely to agree with this statement. The Republican party generally holds a traditional view of gender as biologically determined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
While there's no specific record of Rutherford's stance on this issue, his conservative views might align with the idea of addressing gender identity as a mental health issue rather than a matter of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies
While Rutherford may not necessarily advocate for the repeal of all anti-discrimination laws for private companies, his conservative stance might align with a less regulatory approach to business. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
John Rutherford, a Republican, has not publicly supported adding 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. His party generally opposes such measures, arguing for a more traditional understanding of gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
Rutherford, as a Republican, is unlikely to agree with this statement. His party generally opposes expanding government intervention in issues of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 35,717 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.