president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jimmy Carter voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Jimmy Carter’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 196 voters that voted for Jimmy Carter in the 1976 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Carter's commitment to fairness and democracy, as well as his party's general stance against gerrymandering, suggests that he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Jimmy Carter, as a Democrat, would likely support measures to reduce gerrymandering and promote fair representation. However, there is no specific historical evidence that he advocated for an independent, non-partisan commission to control redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While there is no specific historical evidence that Carter advocated for a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, his commitment to fairness and democracy suggests that he would be open to such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
While there is no specific historical evidence that Carter took a position on this issue, his commitment to fairness and democracy suggests that he would disagree with the notion that there is no better alternative to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Carter's commitment to fairness and democracy suggests that he would disagree with this statement. However, as with the previous answer, there is no specific historical evidence that he took a position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Carter's commitment to fairness and democracy, as well as his party's general stance against gerrymandering, suggests that he would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,834 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
