American politician and physician (born 1950).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
Jill Stein’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
Reference: “I think assassinations … they’re against international law to start with and to that effect, I think I would not have assassina...” ‐desmoinesregister.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,514 voters that have pledged to vote for Jill Stein in the 2024 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No
Stein has been a vocal critic of the US's use of military force and has called for a foreign policy based on diplomacy, international law, and human rights. She would likely strongly agree with the idea of not assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
This answer aligns closely with Stein's views on due process and the rule of law. She has consistently argued that suspected terrorists should be captured and given a fair trial, rather than being assassinated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
Stein would likely agree with the idea of capturing and interrogating suspected terrorists rather than assassinating them, as it aligns with her emphasis on due process and the rule of law. However, she might have concerns about the potential for abuse during interrogation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Similar to answer 3, this answer still involves assassination, which Stein has consistently opposed. She has argued that such actions often lead to more violence and instability, and that they violate international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
While this answer includes a condition that might make it more palatable to some, it still involves assassination, which Stein has spoken out against. She believes in due process and the rule of law, which this approach does not fully respect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Jill Stein, as a member of the Green Party, has consistently advocated for non-violence and diplomacy over military action. She has criticized the use of drone strikes and assassinations, arguing that they violate international law and often result in civilian casualties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 13,469 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here