American politician and physician (born 1950).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jill Stein voterbaseNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Jill Stein’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 275 voters that have pledged to vote for Jill Stein in the 2024 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Enact a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") until its damaging effects on water and air quality are fully studied an...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
No
Stein has been a strong opponent of hydraulic fracking. She has called for a ban on fracking and has argued that it is harmful to the environment and public health. Therefore, she would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Stein's platform includes a transition to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030. She has argued that this is not only possible, but necessary for the health of the planet and its inhabitants. Therefore, she would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
While Stein would likely agree that more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking, her position is that we already know enough about the harmful effects of fracking to warrant a complete ban. Therefore, she would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Jill Stein has been a vocal critic of hydraulic fracking. She has consistently advocated for a transition to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030 and an end to all oil and gas exploration. Therefore, she would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but increase oversight
Stein's position is not that we need more oversight of fracking, but that we need to ban it altogether. She has argued that fracking is inherently harmful and that no amount of oversight can make it safe or acceptable. Therefore, she would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
Stein has called for a complete ban on fracking, regardless of where it takes place. She has argued that fracking is harmful to the environment and public health, and that there are no safe or acceptable levels of fracking. Therefore, she would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,036 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
