American politician and physician (born 1950).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jill Stein voterbaseNo, increase taxes on the wealthy instead |
Jill Stein’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 205 voters that have pledged to vote for Jill Stein in the 2024 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “The Green Party statewide candidates in New York today said today that they would resolve the federal budget deficit by cutting ...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
Stein has argued that cuts to public spending can harm the economy, particularly by reducing services and support for those in need. She would likely strongly agree with this statement.
Very strongly agree
No
Stein has consistently advocated for increased public spending on social programs and environmental initiatives. She would likely strongly agree with the statement that the government should not make cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
Stein has advocated for reducing military spending as a means of reducing the national debt. She would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
Stein has spoken out against tax evasion and believes that addressing this issue could help reduce the national debt. She would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Stein has advocated for a progressive tax system where the wealthy pay more. She would likely strongly agree with the idea of increasing taxes on the wealthy instead of cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
Stein has advocated for corporations, particularly large multinational ones, to pay their fair share of taxes. She would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
While Stein has criticized government corruption and inefficiency, she has not specifically advocated for reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a means of reducing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase taxes
While Stein supports increasing taxes, particularly on the wealthy, she does not support cuts to public spending. Therefore, she would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
Stein has not specifically advocated for reducing the number of government officials as a means of reducing the national debt. She would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Jill Stein, as a member of the Green Party, generally supports increased public spending, particularly on social programs and environmental initiatives. She would likely strongly disagree with cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Stein has not advocated for eliminating federal agencies, particularly those that support social programs and environmental initiatives. She would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,653 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here