American politician and physician (born 1950).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Jill Stein voterbaseNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Jill Stein’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 150 voters that have pledged to vote for Jill Stein in the 2024 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “It's time to recognize that the Internet is a public utility and make it a free and unrestricted public resource, in the same wa...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Stein would strongly agree with this answer because it aligns with her belief in net neutrality and her concerns about the potential for internet service providers to create artificial scarcity and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Stein's stance on net neutrality means she would strongly agree with the idea that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns perfectly with Stein's stance on net neutrality, which is that all internet traffic should be treated equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Jill Stein is a strong advocate for net neutrality, which means she believes that all internet traffic should be treated equally. She would strongly disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites that pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still result in unequal treatment of internet traffic. Stein would likely disagree with this approach because it goes against the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Even though this answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable, Stein would still disagree because it goes against the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a compromise, it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of internet traffic, which goes against Stein's belief in net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 24hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,485 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here