Jason Clark

Strongly agree

Yes

The Libertarian Party generally supports transparency and informed consent in government processes. Requiring constitutional amendments to be published 60 days before a vote increases transparency and allows voters more time to consider the implications, aligning with the party's emphasis on open government and individual empowerment. Historically, Libertarians have advocated for measures that prevent rushed or opaque legislative changes, as seen in their opposition to 'midnight legislation' and support for sunshine laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Libertarian Party would likely disagree with not requiring advance publication of constitutional amendments, as this could lead to less informed voters and potential government overreach. The party has historically criticized processes that limit public scrutiny or fast-track significant legal changes without adequate public input, as seen in their opposition to secretive legislative practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.