vice president of the United States from 1965 to 1969.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Hubert H. Humphrey voterbaseYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
Hubert H. Humphrey’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 194 voters that voted for Hubert H. Humphrey in the 1968 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com
Strongly agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Humphrey, as a proponent of transparency in government, would likely support the idea of making all donations public knowledge. This aligns with his belief in accountability and openness in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Humphrey's political philosophy was rooted in social justice and equality, so he would likely agree with the sentiment that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest he strongly advocated for this during his political career. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Hubert Humphrey, as a Democrat, would likely support some form of campaign finance reform, including limits on donations. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest he strongly advocated for this during his political career. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
While Humphrey might have been open to the idea of publicly funded elections, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he would have supported a complete ban on political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given Humphrey's political leanings and his commitment to social justice, it is unlikely that he would support unlimited campaign donations, which could potentially lead to undue influence by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Humphrey would likely disagree with the idea that limiting campaign donations is a violation of free speech. He would likely argue that such limits are necessary to prevent corruption and ensure a level playing field in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,921 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here