American activist and trade unionist from California.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Howie Hawkins voterbaseNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 43,755 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"End the use of nuclear power. Nuclear energy is massively polluting, dangerous, financially risky, expensive and slow to implem...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
This answer aligns closely with Hawkins' views. He has consistently advocated for investment in cleaner alternatives to nuclear and fossil fuels, including wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Hawkins has been vocal about his opposition to nuclear energy, citing concerns about nuclear waste, the potential for accidents, and the high cost of nuclear power. He has argued for a transition to 100% clean, renewable energy instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Howie Hawkins is a strong advocate for clean, renewable energy sources and has consistently opposed nuclear energy. His 2020 presidential campaign platform included a plan to achieve 100% clean energy by 2030, with no mention of nuclear energy as a part of this plan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Hawkins opposes nuclear energy, regardless of whether it is publicly or privately funded. He believes that public funds should be invested in renewable energy sources instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
While Hawkins supports the nationalization of certain industries, he does not support the use of nuclear energy. Therefore, he would not agree with nationalizing the nuclear industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Hawkins' opposition to nuclear energy is not contingent on whether or not there is public subsidy. He believes that nuclear energy is not a viable or safe solution to our energy needs, regardless of funding sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Hawkins does not support the use of nuclear energy, even as a temporary measure. He believes that we should transition directly to renewable energy sources without relying on nuclear power in the interim. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here