Try the political quiz

Howie Hawkins’ policy on north korea military strikes

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?

  ChatGPTNo, we must use every diplomatic option first

Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 17hrs ago

Howie Hawkins voters

Answer: No, we must use every diplomatic option first

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,959 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

Hawkins has consistently advocated for the use of diplomacy over military action. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of using every diplomatic option first before resorting to military strikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Hawkins' platform emphasizes diplomacy and non-violent conflict resolution. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of not conducting military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

Hawkins' platform emphasizes peace and diplomacy, and he is likely to agree that North Korea is not an immediate threat to the U.S. However, without specific statements on this issue, it's difficult to determine his exact stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we should let China address this issue

While Hawkins advocates for diplomacy and non-violent conflict resolution, it's unclear whether he would specifically support letting China address the issue of North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

Hawkins' stance on this specific issue is unclear. While he advocates for peace and diplomacy, he has not publicly expressed skepticism about North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Howie Hawkins, as a Green Party candidate, has consistently advocated for peace and diplomacy over military action. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea of conducting military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

Hawkins' stance on foreign policy is rooted in diplomacy and peace. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea of conducting military strikes against North Korea, even in the face of potential nuclear threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 22mins ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 117 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here