Try the political quiz

Howie Hawkins’ policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  Howie Hawkins voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 14hrs ago

Howie Hawkins voters

Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,416 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.

Party influence

Green Party Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “ Also the Supreme Court’s gutting of the Voting Rights Act by judicial sophistry in the recent Shelby County v. Holder decision ...” ‐gp.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

Howie Hawkins, as a Green Party candidate, has consistently advocated for electoral reforms that would reduce the influence of partisan politics. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Hawkins has advocated for a variety of electoral reforms, including proportional representation. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of switching to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Hawkins has spoken out against gerrymandering, arguing that it gives an unfair advantage to the party in power. He would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given Hawkins' stance on reducing the influence of partisan politics in electoral processes, he would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has advocated for reforms that would make the process more fair and less influenced by the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Hawkins has advocated for electoral reforms, suggesting that he believes there are better alternatives to the current system. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea that there is no better alternative to the current system of redrawing Congressional districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Hawkins has been critical of gerrymandering, arguing that it undermines the democratic process. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4hrs ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 208 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here