American politician and diplomat (born 1947).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes |
Hillary Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Increase public investment in clean energy R&D, including in storage technology, designed materials, advanced nuclear, and carb...” ‐hillaryclinton.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Answer: Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 814 voters that voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “During the 2008 presidential campaign, it was Sen. John McCain, not then Sen. Barack Obama, who touted nuclear power. Obama, for...” ‐usnews.com
Strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Clinton has strongly advocated for investment in renewable energy sources, including wind and hydroelectric power. While she has not specifically mentioned thorium or geothermal energy, her overall stance on clean energy aligns with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Clinton's stance on energy policy aligns with this answer. She has expressed support for nuclear energy as part of a diverse energy mix, while also advocating for increased investment in renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Hillary Clinton has shown some support for nuclear energy, but it is not her primary focus. She has stated that nuclear power has a role in our energy future, but she also emphasizes the importance of safety and waste disposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Clinton has generally supported government investment in energy infrastructure, which could include subsidies for nuclear energy. However, she has not specifically addressed this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Clinton has not specifically addressed the issue of public subsidies for nuclear energy. However, she has generally supported government investment in energy infrastructure, which could include subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Clinton has not outright opposed nuclear energy. She has expressed concerns about safety and waste disposal, but she has not called for a complete halt to its use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
Clinton has not advocated for the nationalization of any industry, including the nuclear industry. Her economic policies generally favor a mix of public and private sector involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 49mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 148,302 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here