American politician and diplomat (born 1947).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo |
Hillary Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “Now, all of the parties involved — including the federal government, the pipeline company and contractors, the state of North Da...” ‐nbcnews.com
0% Voter Support: 0 support and 1 oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 369 voters that voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Agree
No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land
Clinton's campaign released a statement in 2016 saying that all voices should be heard and all views considered in federal infrastructure projects. This suggests she might support a reroute of the pipeline to respect Native American land rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident
Clinton has generally supported stricter regulations and penalties for environmental damage caused by energy projects, so she might support increased fines for accidents related to the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Hillary Clinton's stance on the Dakota Access pipeline has been somewhat ambiguous. While she has expressed concern for the rights of Native Americans and the environment, she has not explicitly called for a halt to the pipeline's construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
While Clinton has expressed concern for property rights, she has not explicitly opposed the use of eminent domain for public projects. Her stance on this specific issue is unclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Clinton has not explicitly supported the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, but her silence on the issue during her 2016 campaign and her general support for energy infrastructure projects suggest she may not be entirely opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 18,566 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here