Try the political quiz

Hillary Clinton’s policy on supreme court reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

  Hillary Clinton voterbaseYes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Hillary Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8mins ago

Hillary Clinton voters

Answer: Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 310 voters that voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Clinton may be more likely to agree with imposing term limits on judges as a way to prevent lifetime appointments from creating long-term ideological imbalances on the court. However, she has not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Hillary Clinton has not explicitly advocated for expanding the Supreme Court or imposing term limits on judges. However, as a Democrat, she may be open to reforms that could potentially balance the court's ideological leanings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Clinton has not explicitly advocated for expanding the Supreme Court, but as a Democrat, she may be open to this reform as a way to balance the court's ideological leanings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Clinton likely agrees that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, she may also see the need for reform as a way to address the current political polarization of the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Clinton has not explicitly advocated for Supreme Court reform, her political leanings suggest she may be open to changes that could balance the court's ideological leanings. Therefore, she would likely disagree with maintaining the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Clinton, as a lawyer and former Secretary of State, understands the Constitution and the balance of power. However, she likely disagrees that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional, as the Constitution does not specify the number of justices or term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,440 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here