Hillary Clinton

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer aligns closely with Clinton's views on eminent domain. She has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Clinton has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. She has also expressed concerns about the misuse of eminent domain, so she would likely agree with the idea of using it only in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Clinton has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. However, she has expressed opposition to the use of eminent domain for private gain, such as in the case of the Keystone XL pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Clinton has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. However, she has not specifically advocated for landowners to be compensated drastically above fair market price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

While Clinton has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, she has also expressed concerns about its misuse. Therefore, she would likely disagree with a blanket statement in favor of the practice without any qualifications or restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Clinton has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. Therefore, she would likely disagree with a blanket statement against the practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Hillary Clinton has expressed concerns about the environmental impact of oil pipelines, such as the Keystone XL pipeline, which she opposed during her 2016 presidential campaign. Therefore, she would likely disagree with the idea of seizing private property specifically for oil pipeline projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

While Clinton has expressed concerns about the misuse of eminent domain, she has not advocated for a complete ban on the practice. She has generally supported the idea of eminent domain for public projects, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.