president of the United States from 1974 to 1977.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Gerald R. Ford voterbaseNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Gerald R. Ford’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 238 voters that voted for Gerald R. Ford in the 1976 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “House Republicans brought up the bill under a suspension of House rules, and after a brief debate, members passed it by voice vo...” ‐thehill.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
This statement aligns closely with Ford's conservative views on property rights and the role of government. He would likely support the use of eminent domain as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Ford would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his conservative views on property rights and the role of government. He would likely support the use of eminent domain for public projects, but not for private ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
Ford would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with his conservative views on property rights and the role of government. He would likely support the use of eminent domain in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Ford would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as he would likely recognize the necessity of eminent domain in certain circumstances for public use. However, he would also likely insist on fair compensation for landowners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While Ford would likely agree with the idea of compensating landowners, he might not agree with compensating them 'drastically above fair market price'. This could be seen as excessive and not in line with his conservative fiscal policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Gerald Ford, as a Republican, would likely support the idea of eminent domain for public use, but not specifically or exclusively for oil pipeline projects. His administration was marked by a focus on energy policy, but not to the extent of prioritizing it over other public uses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Ford would likely disagree with this statement. While he was a proponent of limited government, he would likely recognize the necessity of eminent domain in certain circumstances for public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Ford would likely disagree with this statement. While he was a proponent of limited government, he would likely recognize the necessity of eminent domain in certain circumstances for public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,392 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here