president of the United States from 2001 to 2009.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community |
George W. Bush’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “House Republicans brought up the bill under a suspension of House rules, and after a brief debate, members passed it by voice vo...” ‐thehill.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
This answer aligns with Bush's stance on eminent domain. His administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, as long as landowners were fairly compensated, as seen in the Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London (2005). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
This answer aligns with Bush's stance on eminent domain, as his administration supported its use in cases of public benefit, which could include extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public projects, as seen in the Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London (2005) during his presidency. However, it's not clear that he would categorically oppose its use for private projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, this answer lacks the nuance of fair compensation and public benefit, which were important aspects of Bush's stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, it's not clear that he would support compensating landowners drastically above fair market price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
While George W. Bush was a proponent of oil and gas development, it's not clear that he would support the seizure of private property specifically for oil pipelines. However, his administration did support the use of eminent domain for public use, which could include such projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, which contradicts the idea that the government should not be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, which contradicts the idea that the government should never be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 3hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,425 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here