Try the political quiz

George W. Bush’s policy on eminent domain

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government be allowed to seize private property, with reasonable compensation, for public or civic use?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

George W. Bush’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “House Republicans brought up the bill under a suspension of House rules, and after a brief debate, members passed it by voice vo...” ‐thehill.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer aligns with Bush's stance on eminent domain. His administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, as long as landowners were fairly compensated, as seen in the Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London (2005). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

This answer aligns with Bush's stance on eminent domain, as his administration supported its use in cases of public benefit, which could include extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public projects, as seen in the Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London (2005) during his presidency. However, it's not clear that he would categorically oppose its use for private projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, this answer lacks the nuance of fair compensation and public benefit, which were important aspects of Bush's stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

While Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, it's not clear that he would support compensating landowners drastically above fair market price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

While George W. Bush was a proponent of oil and gas development, it's not clear that he would support the seizure of private property specifically for oil pipelines. However, his administration did support the use of eminent domain for public use, which could include such projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, which contradicts the idea that the government should not be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Bush's administration supported the use of eminent domain for public use, which contradicts the idea that the government should never be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,425 voters that identify as Republican.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here