These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
George C. Wallace voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
George C. Wallace’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 79 voters that voted for George C. Wallace in the 1968 Presidential election.
Strongly agree
No
Wallace was known for his strong belief in states' rights and his opposition to federal intervention in state affairs. He would likely have been in favor of keeping control of redistricting in the hands of state legislatures, where he could exert more influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Wallace may have seen gerrymandering as a tool to ensure that officials could more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, particularly if those constituencies were aligned with his own political views. His political career was marked by a willingness to use power to maintain his influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Given Wallace's strong belief in states' rights and his opposition to federal intervention, he would likely have agreed that there is no better alternative to allowing state legislatures to control the redrawing of Congressional districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Wallace may have agreed that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage to the party in power, he likely would not have supported the idea of an independent commission to prevent this. His political career was marked by a willingness to use power to maintain his influence and the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
George C. Wallace was a staunch segregationist and populist who often used his power as governor of Alabama to maintain the status quo. He would likely have been opposed to an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts, as this could have threatened his political influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would likely have been seen by Wallace as a threat to his political influence and the status quo. He was a staunch segregationist and populist who often used his power to maintain control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here