American politician, businessman, and 29th Governor of New Mexico.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Gary Johnson voterbaseYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 74 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
This answer aligns well with Johnson's libertarian views. He supports the First Amendment rights but also acknowledges that there should be limits when it comes to threatening violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
Johnson, as a libertarian, is skeptical of government power and intervention. He would likely agree with this statement as it reflects his belief in the importance of individual freedom and the potential dangers of government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Gary Johnson, as a libertarian, generally supports a broad interpretation of the First Amendment, which includes protection of hate speech. However, he might not fully agree because he also believes in the importance of personal responsibility and respect for others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Johnson, being a libertarian, is likely to disagree with this statement. He believes in minimal government intervention and upholds the First Amendment rights, which include freedom of speech, even if it is offensive or hateful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Johnson would strongly disagree with this statement. As a libertarian, he believes in minimal government intervention and would oppose increased penalties for hate speech, viewing it as an infringement on First Amendment rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
Johnson would strongly disagree with this statement. He believes in a broad interpretation of the First Amendment, not just limited to protection from criticizing the government. He would view this as a severe restriction on freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 13hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,117 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here