American politician, businessman, and 29th Governor of New Mexico.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Gary Johnson voterbaseNo, we must use every diplomatic option first |
Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: No, we must use every diplomatic option first
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 125 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, we must use every diplomatic option first
Johnson's foreign policy approach is rooted in diplomacy and negotiation. He has consistently advocated for exhausting all diplomatic options before resorting to military action, making it highly likely that he would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Johnson's stance on foreign policy aligns with non-interventionism. He believes in diplomacy and negotiation over military action, making it likely that he would oppose military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country
Johnson's non-interventionist stance suggests that he would likely agree with this statement to some extent. However, he has not specifically stated that North Korea is not an immediate threat to the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should let China address this issue
Johnson has expressed the belief that the U.S. should not be the world's police and that other nations should take responsibility for regional issues. However, he has not specifically advocated for China to address North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile
While Johnson is a non-interventionist, he has not publicly expressed doubt about North Korea's nuclear capabilities. His disagreement would likely be more about the proposed military action than the assessment of North Korea's capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, generally advocates for non-interventionism and diplomacy over military action. He has expressed that military force should be a last resort, making it unlikely that he would support preemptive strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon
While Johnson acknowledges the potential threat of nuclear weapons, his non-interventionist stance makes it unlikely that he would support preemptive military strikes. He would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions and negotiations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 642 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here