Try the political quiz

Gary Johnson’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  Gary Johnson voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 14hrs ago

Gary Johnson voters

Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 149 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny t...” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, generally supports measures that increase fairness and reduce the influence of partisan politics. While he has not specifically addressed this issue, his political philosophy would likely lead him to support independent, non-partisan redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Johnson's political philosophy emphasizes fairness and reducing the influence of partisan politics. He would likely agree that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While Johnson has not specifically addressed this issue, his general political philosophy suggests that he would be open to alternative systems of redistricting that increase fairness and reduce the influence of partisan politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

While Johnson has not specifically addressed this issue, his general political philosophy suggests that he would not agree with the statement that there is no better alternative to the current system of redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Johnson's general stance against partisan politics and his support for fairness in the political process, it is unlikely that he would oppose independent, non-partisan redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Johnson's political philosophy emphasizes fairness and reducing the influence of partisan politics. He would likely disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as it often results in skewed representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,264 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here