Try the political quiz

Gary Johnson’s policy on eminent domain

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government be allowed to seize private property, with reasonable compensation, for public or civic use?

  Public statementsNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Reference: “Trump: "...when #eminentdomain is used on somebody's property, that person gets a fortune." In what world is that??” ‐twitter.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.

Updated 13hrs ago

Gary Johnson voters

Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 217 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “ the right to property -- accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationa...” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

This statement aligns strongly with Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He believes in minimal government intervention and would likely strongly oppose the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

This statement aligns strongly with Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He believes in minimal government intervention and would likely strongly oppose the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Johnson might somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in limited government intervention. However, he would likely still have reservations about the government seizing private property at all, even in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Johnson might somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in limited government intervention. However, he would likely still have reservations about the government seizing private property at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

While Johnson might agree with the idea of fair compensation and community benefit, he would likely still oppose the government's right to seize private property in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

While Johnson might agree with the idea of landowners being compensated above fair market price, he would likely still oppose the government's right to seize private property in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, would likely disagree with this statement. He believes in minimal government intervention and would not support the government seizing private property for any specific industry, including oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

This statement is in direct opposition to Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He would strongly disagree with the government having the right to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,136 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here