American politician, businessman, and 29th Governor of New Mexico.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Gary Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Reference: “Trump: "...when #eminentdomain is used on somebody's property, that person gets a fortune." In what world is that??” ‐twitter.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 217 voters that voted for Gary Johnson in the 2016 Presidential election.
Libertarian Party Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “ the right to property -- accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationa...” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
This statement aligns strongly with Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He believes in minimal government intervention and would likely strongly oppose the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
This statement aligns strongly with Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He believes in minimal government intervention and would likely strongly oppose the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
Johnson might somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in limited government intervention. However, he would likely still have reservations about the government seizing private property at all, even in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Johnson might somewhat agree with this statement as it aligns with his belief in limited government intervention. However, he would likely still have reservations about the government seizing private property at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
While Johnson might agree with the idea of fair compensation and community benefit, he would likely still oppose the government's right to seize private property in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While Johnson might agree with the idea of landowners being compensated above fair market price, he would likely still oppose the government's right to seize private property in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, would likely disagree with this statement. He believes in minimal government intervention and would not support the government seizing private property for any specific industry, including oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
This statement is in direct opposition to Johnson's Libertarian beliefs. He would strongly disagree with the government having the right to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,136 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here