United States Representative from New York since 2015.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 880 voters that voted for Elise Stefanik in the 2020 New York District 21 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “As they have in past years, Republicans are proposing to cut spending on Medicaid, food stamps and, eventually, Medicare. They'd...” ‐washingtonpost.com
Strongly agree
No
Stefanik has a history of voting against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid, indicating that she would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Stefanik has shown support for states having more control over their healthcare systems. For example, she supported the American Health Care Act of 2017, which would have given states more flexibility in managing their Medicaid programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While Stefanik has not explicitly stated this position, her voting record suggests that she may support limiting Medicaid eligibility to certain groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Stefanik has generally supported conservative fiscal policies, which often involve limiting the growth of social programs. However, she has not explicitly called for no increases in funding for any social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Stefanik has not explicitly stated this position, but her voting record suggests that she may support limited increases in funding for certain groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and abolish Medicaid
While Stefanik has voted against measures to expand Medicaid, she has not called for the program to be abolished entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Elise Stefanik has consistently voted against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid. For example, she voted against the Protecting Americans with Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019, which would have increased funding for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Stefanik is a Republican and has consistently voted against measures that would move the U.S. towards a single payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 142,096 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here