Try the political quiz

Elise Stefanik’s policy on supreme court reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

  ChatGPTNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Stefanik would likely strongly agree with the statement that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. This is a common viewpoint among Republicans, who often argue that court reforms proposed by Democrats are attempts to politicize the judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Stefanik, as a conservative Republican, is likely to oppose reforms to the Supreme Court such as adding more seats or imposing term limits on judges. She has not publicly advocated for such changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Stefanik, as a conservative Republican, is likely to agree with the statement that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. This aligns with the general Republican stance on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Stefanik has not publicly stated her position on this specific issue, it is unlikely that she would support term limits for Supreme Court judges, as this is generally not a position supported by Republicans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Elise Stefanik is a Republican and has not publicly supported the idea of expanding the Supreme Court or imposing term limits on judges. Republicans generally oppose these reforms, viewing them as attempts to politicize the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Stefanik is unlikely to support adding more seats to the Supreme Court, a concept often referred to as 'court packing.' This is a position generally associated with progressive Democrats, not Republicans like Stefanik. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,391 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here