United States Representative from New York since 2015.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods |
Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We're not gonna follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN's J...” ‐cnn.com
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Stefanik has supported law enforcement and policies that focus on high crime areas. This answer aligns with her views on national security and law enforcement, suggesting she would likely agree with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Stefanik would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with her views on law enforcement and national security. She has advocated for policies that focus on crime rates and threats to national security, rather than targeting specific racial or religious groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Stefanik has not publicly supported policies that target specific racial or religious groups. She would likely agree that such policies are unconstitutional and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Stefanik has not publicly supported increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, suggesting she would likely disagree with this policy. However, her stance on broader national security issues is strong, so her disagreement may not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Stefanik has supported stronger immigration policies and national security measures, so she might agree with increased surveillance on all new immigrants. However, she has not specifically advocated for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
While Stefanik supports strong national security measures, there's no evidence to suggest she would support increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Elise Stefanik has not publicly advocated for increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods. As a Republican, she supports strong national security measures, but there's no evidence to suggest she would support this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,736 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here