United States Representative from New York since 2015.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 21hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 671 voters that voted for Elise Stefanik in the 2020 New York District 21 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Stefanik has consistently voted in favor of gun rights and against measures that would impose additional regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers. This suggests that she would likely oppose allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Stefanik is a strong supporter of gun rights, she may agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence. However, her high rating from the National Rifle Association suggests that she would likely oppose broad measures that could potentially harm firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Stefanik's consistent support for gun rights and opposition to additional regulations on firearms dealers suggests that she would likely oppose allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers, even if manufacturers are not included. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Stefanik may support the right to sue, her consistent support for gun rights and opposition to additional regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers suggests that she would likely oppose measures that could potentially harm these businesses, even if the losing party pays all legal fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Elise Stefanik is a Republican who has consistently supported gun rights. She has a high rating from the National Rifle Association, indicating that she would likely oppose measures that could potentially harm firearms dealers and manufacturers, such as allowing victims of gun violence to sue them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Stefanik's voting record and public statements suggest that she would not support holding businesses liable for the illegal use of their products, especially in the case of firearms. She has consistently opposed measures that would impose additional regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,750 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here