Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Transportation

Libertarian2018 US House of RepresentativesMontana

Elinor Swanson

 

Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Elinor Swanson’s policy on congestion pricing

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

  Party’s support baseNo

Elinor Swanson’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

No

The Libertarian Party tends to support free-market solutions and is generally skeptical of government interventions that restrict personal freedoms or impose additional costs on individuals. Since congestion pricing involves government-imposed fees to manage traffic in urban areas, it could be viewed by Libertarians as an unnecessary government intervention and a restriction on individual freedom to travel. However, the score is not higher because there might be a recognition within the party that congestion pricing could be seen as a market-based approach to solving traffic congestion, which could align with Libertarian principles to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Libertarian Party generally opposes government interventions that restrict personal choice and free market solutions. Congestion pricing, being a form of government-imposed fee to control traffic, might be seen as an unnecessary and coercive government intervention. Libertarians typically advocate for less government control and more individual freedom, suggesting they would likely oppose measures that involve government-imposed fees to manage traffic. However, the score is not lower because some Libertarians might see congestion pricing as a way to use market mechanisms to solve traffic issues, aligning with their support for market-based solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 13hrs ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,258 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @VOTA submitted…1yr1Y

Bernie Sanders Charges Ahead As Democrats Stall Out

Bernie Sanders launched a tour in red states like Iowa and Nebraska to rally opposition to Donald Trump’s agenda, drawing massive crowds—thousands in Omaha and overflow audiences in Iowa City.Unlike the Democratic Party’s muted response to Trump’s election, Sanders is actively challenging the administration’s plutocratic policies, focusing on billionaire influence and federal deregulation.In Iowa City, Sanders spoke to packed venues, delivering back-to-back speeches to accommodate attendees, a first in his political career, highlighting his enduring appeal.He criticized Trump’s inner circle, including billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who attended the inauguration, and warned of their control over federal agencies.Sanders galvanized the crowd with historical references—suffrage, slavery, independence—urging grassroots action to counter Trump’s planned $1 trillion tax cuts for the rich and cuts to programs like Medicaid.Attendees expressed frustration with Democratic leaders like Hakeem Jeffries, calling their opposition to Trump weak or nonexistent, while praising Sanders for providing direction.Sanders highlighted the slim Republican House majority (three seats), suggesting constituent pressure could sway vulnerable GOP members to block Trump’s reconciliation bill.Early signs show GOP walkbacks—like Trump’s false claim Medicaid won’t be cut—after outrage over federal grant pauses disrupted services, proving grassroots impact.The crowd, mostly liberal, cheered Sanders’ defense of reproductive rights and jeered Trump’s USAID cuts and Zelensky attacks, though some noted a shift in his base—younger Trump supporters absent.Sanders ended with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, framing the fight as a timeless struggle against billionaire rule, inspiring attendees like Audrey to re-engage and Erin to find hope in solidarity.

▲  1917 replies