Elinor Swanson

Agree

Yes

The Libertarian Party generally supports decentralization, increased local control, and reforms that can reduce government overreach. A state constitutional convention could provide an opportunity to limit government power, expand individual liberties, and address issues such as civil asset forfeiture or tax reform—positions the Libertarian Party has historically advocated for. However, there is some caution about the unpredictability of conventions, as they could also result in less liberty if dominated by opposing interests. Overall, the party would lean toward supporting the opportunity for reform, as seen in their support for similar measures in other states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Libertarian Party would likely disagree with rejecting a constitutional convention outright, as this would maintain the status quo and limit opportunities for reforming government structure and protecting individual rights. Historically, Libertarians have criticized entrenched government systems and have advocated for mechanisms that allow for significant change, such as constitutional amendments or conventions. However, their disagreement is not absolute, as they recognize the risks of a convention being co-opted by special interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.