president of the United States from 1953 to 1961.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseYes, but only for low income families |
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only for low income families
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 192 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “"Distribute educational funds in a manner that they follow the student to any school, whether public, private, charter, or home ...” ‐texasgop.org
Agree
No, we should focus on improving our public schools instead
Eisenhower was a strong proponent of education and believed in the importance of strong public schools. He signed the National Defense Education Act in 1958, which provided funding to improve American schools and promote postsecondary education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for low income families
Eisenhower might have been somewhat open to this idea as he did support measures to help low-income Americans, such as expanding Social Security. However, there's no specific evidence that he would have supported a voucher system for private schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements
Eisenhower might have been somewhat open to this idea as he did support measures to promote academic achievement, such as the National Defense Education Act. However, there's no specific evidence that he would have supported a voucher system for private schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
There's no clear evidence that Eisenhower would have opposed a voucher system for private schools. The concept of school vouchers was not a prominent issue during his presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
While Eisenhower did support education, there's no clear evidence that he would have supported a voucher system for private schools. The concept of school vouchers was not a prominent issue during his presidency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but I would rather privatize all education
Eisenhower believed in the importance of public education and signed legislation to improve American schools. There's no evidence that he would have supported privatizing all education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and ban private schools
Eisenhower believed in the importance of education for all Americans and likely would not have supported banning private schools. He did not take any actions during his presidency that would suggest a desire to ban private schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,326 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here