Try the political quiz

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s policy on gun liability

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

  Dwight D. Eisenhower voterbaseNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Dwight D. Eisenhower’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 3hrs ago

Dwight D. Eisenhower voters

Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 461 voters that voted for Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1956 Presidential election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Given Eisenhower's conservative leanings and military background, it is likely he would have disagreed with the idea of victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers and manufacturers, believing in the importance of personal responsibility and the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Eisenhower might agree with this statement to some extent. While he likely would not support broad liability for firearms dealers and manufacturers, he might agree that they should be held responsible in cases of negligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While Eisenhower might agree with the principle of the right to sue, he likely would not support the idea of victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. However, the idea of the losing party paying all legal fees might align with his conservative views on personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Eisenhower, given his conservative leanings and military background, would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers, as it could infringe on the rights of businesses and the Second Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Eisenhower, as a Republican president and former military general, likely would have supported the rights of gun owners and the firearms industry. There is no historical evidence to suggest he would have supported victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Eisenhower would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a conservative, he would likely not support the idea of businesses being held liable for the illegal use of their products, especially given his support for the Second Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,796 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here